CEFR Level: C2 (Proficiency)

Also available in: A1 | A2 | B1 | B2 | C1

The Imaginative Ape: How a Bonobo’s Pretend Tea Party Disrupts the Philosophy of Human Exceptionalism

February 2026 — In what researchers characterize as a paradigm-shifting contribution to comparative cognition, a study published in the journal Science has marshaled compelling empirical evidence that Kanzi, a 43-year-old bonobo, possesses the capacity for imaginative pretend play—a cognitive faculty that has served as a cornerstone of arguments for human uniqueness since antiquity.

The Philosophical Stakes of Secondary Representation

The capacity to entertain mental representations divorced from immediate perceptual reality—what developmental psychologists designate “secondary representation”—has long occupied a privileged position in theories of human exceptionalism. When a child hosts a tea party with empty cups, she engages in a sophisticated cognitive act: simultaneously maintaining the representation of actual emptiness while superimposing an imagined state in which tea exists. This capacity for what philosophers might term “counterfactual simulation” has been theorized as a prerequisite for everything from symbolic language to moral reasoning.

The implications of demonstrating such capacity in a non-human primate extend well beyond the parameters of cognitive science, touching upon foundational questions in philosophy of mind, ethics, and our species’ self-conception.

Experimental Epistemology

The research team at Johns Hopkins University, comprising Christopher Krupenye and Amalia Bastos among others, confronted a formidable methodological challenge: how does one empirically demonstrate the presence of imaginary content in a non-linguistic mind? Their solution employed transparent vessels and carefully controlled conditions to eliminate alternative explanations.

In the primary experimental condition, researchers performed a pantomime sequence before Kanzi: ostensibly pouring juice from an empty transparent pitcher into one of two empty transparent cups, then returning the “juice” to the pitcher. When queried regarding the liquid’s location, Kanzi indicated the correct vessel in 68 percent of trials—a performance that, while imperfect, deviates significantly from chance and resists explanation by behavioral cueing or associative learning.

A methodologically elegant follow-up experiment addressed the epistemic concern that Kanzi might harbor genuine belief in the juice’s existence. Presented with a binary choice between genuine and pantomimed juice, Kanzi demonstrated robust preference for the former in 78 percent of trials—evidence that his participation in the pretense coexisted with accurate reality monitoring.

The Enculturation Question

The researchers forthrightly acknowledge a significant limitation: Kanzi’s extensive enculturation, which includes comprehension of spoken English and fluency in a lexigram system exceeding 300 symbols, renders him atypical of his species. Whether the imaginative capacities documented herein represent latent abilities present across great apes or, alternatively, emergent properties of prolonged human cultural immersion remains an empirical question for subsequent investigation.

This uncertainty does not, however, diminish the philosophical import of the findings. If imagination can be cultivated in apes through enculturation, this suggests the cognitive architecture necessary for pretense exists as an evolutionary inheritance shared with our last common ancestor—dormant perhaps, but not absent.

Toward a Post-Exceptionalist Anthropology

The investigators draw explicit parallels to Jane Goodall’s 1960 observation of tool manufacture in chimpanzees—a discovery that famously prompted Louis Leakey to declare that we must “redefine tool, redefine man, or accept chimpanzees as humans.” The present findings constitute an analogous inflection point.

“Imagination has long been seen as a critical element of what it is to be human,” observed Krupenye, “but the idea that it may not be exclusive to our species is really transformative.”

As Bastos notes, Kanzi demonstrates the capacity to “generate an idea of this pretend object and at the same time know it’s not real”—a formulation that captures the essence of what has traditionally been characterized as a uniquely human cognitive achievement.

The ramifications extend beyond academic discourse. If the capacity for imagination—the foundation of art, science, religion, and our entire symbolic existence—is shared with our primate cousins, the ethical and philosophical consequences demand sustained interdisciplinary engagement. The boundary we have drawn around human minds appears, upon closer inspection, rather more permeable than we had supposed.

Vocabulary Help

• anthropocentric = viewing humans as the central or most important element of existence
• counterfactual simulation = mentally modeling scenarios that differ from actual reality
• epistemic = relating to knowledge and how we know what we know
• paradigm-shifting = fundamentally changing the framework through which a field is understood
• permeable = allowing things to pass through; not rigidly bounded

Grammar Focus

• Reduced relative clauses: “A finding constituting an inflection point” (= that constitutes)
• Subjunctive mood: “Whether the capacities represent latent abilities remains empirical”
• Complex nominalization: “The demonstrating of such capacity” → “The demonstration of such capacity”
• Epistemic hedging: “This suggests…” / “What has traditionally been characterized as…”